Disability Disclosure in the Workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.107Abstract
This paper is concerned with workplace accommodation and the extent to which people feel able to disclose disabilities at work. Disclosure is central to accommodation in the sense that workers must feel comfortable describing their needs to employers. Where this is not the case - for example, where workers are concerned about the precariousness of their position and the fact that disclosure may result in dismissal - legal requirements for accommodation can be ineffective. To explore this issue, the paper uses qualitative data from interviews with fifty-nine people with physical, learning, psychiatric and sensory disabilities in the Hamilton labour market. Analysis indicates that most respondents viewed disclosure as a risky endeavour, and a significant minority did not disclose due to concerns about not being hired or being dismissed. The conclusion discusses the need for accommodating workplaces and the implications for the labour movement.
References
Allaire, S. (2004) What work changes do people with arthritis make to preserve employment, and are such changes effective? Arthritis and Rheumatism 51, 871-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20832
Barnes, C., Mercer, G. and Shakespeare, T. (1999) Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Bishop, M. (2002) Barriers to employment among people with epilepsy: report of a focus group. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 17, 281-286.
Chouinard, V. (2001) Legal peripheries: struggles over disabled Canadians’ places in law, society and space. Canadian Geographer 45, 187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2001.tb01184.x
Cranford, C., Vosko, L. and Zukewich, N. (2003) Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: A statistical portrait. Just Labour 3, 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/007495ar
Dyck, I. and Jongbloed, L. (2000) Women with Multiple Sclerosis and employment issues: A focus on social and institutional environments. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 67, 337-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740006700506
Ellison, M., Russinova, Z., Macdonald-Wilson, K., and Lyass, A. (2003) Patterns and correlates of workplace disclosure among professionals and managers with psychiatric conditions. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 18, 3-13.
Gignac, M., Badley, E, Lacaille, D., Cott, C., Adam, P. and Anis, A. (2004) Managing arthritis and employment: making arthritis-related work changes as a means of adaptation. Arthritis & Rheumatism 51 (6), 909–916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20822
Goldberg, S., Killeen, M. and O’Day, B. (2005) The disclosure conundrum: How people with psychiatric disabilities navigate employment. Psychology, public policy and law 11, 463-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.463
Hatfield, R. (2005) Duty to Accommodate. Just Labour 5, 23-33.
Honey, A. (2003) The impact of mental illness on employment: Consumers’ perspectives. Work 20, 267-276.
Imrie R. (1996) Disability and the city: International perspectives. London: Paul Chapman.
Krahn, H. and Lowe, G. (2002) Work, Industry, and Canadian Society. Toronto: Thomson Nelson.
Leslie, D. and Butz, D. (1998) ‘GM Suicide’: flexibility, space and the injured body. Economic Geography 360-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/144330
Livingston, G. (2006) Ontario introduces contentious rights bill. Toronto Star, April 26 (http://www.thestar.com/ article id 1146088213631)
Lowton, K. (2004) Only when I cough? Adults’ disclosure of Cystic Fibrosis. Qualitative health research 14, 167-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260675
Lunt, N. and Thornton, P. (1994) Disability and employment: Towards and understanding of discourse and policy. Disability and Society 9, 223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599466780231
Madaus, J., Foley, T., McGuire, J., Ruban, J. and Lilia, M. (2002) Employment self-disclosure of postsecondary graduates with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 35, 364-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350040701
Ontario Human Rights Commission (1999) Human rights at work The Commission, Toronto
Ontario Human Rights Commission (2000) Policy and guidelines on disability and the duty to accommodate. The Commission, Toronto.
Vosko, L. (2000) Temporary Work: The Gendered Rise of a Precarious Employment Relationship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442680432
Wilton R. (2004) From Flexibility to Accommodation? Disabled People and the Reinvention of Paid Work. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS 29, 420-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00139.x
Yates, C. (2004) Rebuilding the Labour Movement by Organizing the Unorganized: Strategic Considerations. Studies in Political Economy 74, 171-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2004.11675143
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2006-03-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
