Can Joint Training Increase Union Knowledge and Power?

Authors

  • Corliss Olson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.137

Abstract

Globalization has been accompanied by a decline in unionization; however, while globalization presents extremely serious challenges to unions, globalization does not necessarily result in weakened unions. It is important for unions to identify and utilize ways to increase and leverage union power that are responsive to the pressures of globalization. Companies frequently introduce training during restructuring efforts aimed at remaining competitive in a global environment. This paper describes a joint union-management training program which offers an example of a pro-active union approach to joint training initiatives. The training took place in early 2004 in a typical paper mill in central Wisconsin. While the training was designed and undertaken in response to various competitive pressures, the content of the training was primarily determined by employee focus groups. The training design is examined against criteria for successful union involvement in joint ventures. The paper argues that, while joint ventures typically address management's production concerns at the expense of labor, a pro-active union can work to ensure that benefits also accrue to the union. Recent literature on union power in a globalized economy suggests that this training model could be used in other industries to enhance union knowledge and power.

References

Barynin, Peter. “Pulpwood prices challenge competitiveness of mills.”www.paperloop.com. Nov. 2004.

Battista, Andrew. “US tissue prices on the rise.” In Tissue World,August/September 2004 – Market Issues. www.paperloop.com.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1994. “Technology and Labor in Pulp, Paper,Paperboard and Selected Converting Industries.” Bulletin 2443,Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Frost, Ann. “Creating and Sustaining Local Union Capabilities: The Role of theNational Union.” Relations Industrielles, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2001: 307-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/000027ar

Haddad, Carol. “Labor Participation in Plant Modernization: Findings from aDemonstration Project in the Small and Medium-Size Firm Sector.”Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, Summer 2004, 55-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lab.2004.0019

Levesque, Christian and Gregor Murray. “Globalization and the Joint Regulation of Workplace Change.” Relations Industrielles, Vol. 53, No. 1,1998.

Levesque, Christian and Gregor Murray. “Local Versus Global: Activating Local Union Power in the Global Economy.” Labor Studies Journal, Vol 27, No.3, Fall 2002, 39-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lab.2002.0036

Mericle, Ken, Corliss Olson, Frank Emspak and Richard Thomson. "Factors ThatUndermine Cooperative Attempts To Implement High Performance Work Organization." Relations Industrielles. (with Ken Mericle, Frank Emspak and Richard Thomson), Selected Papers from the XXXVIIIth Annual Canadian Relations Assoc. Conference, 2002, 171-187.

Olson, Corliss. “High Performance Work Organizations: Potholes in the Manufacturing High Road.” Paper presented to the Wisconsin Chapter of the Industrial Relations Research Association, April, 2000.

Olson, Corliss, Myung-Sook Jun, and Susan Moeser. "The Impact Of ConflictManagement Training On Perceptions Of Conflict In The Paper Industry." International Industrial Relations Association/Canadian Industrial Relations Association, June 2002, Toronto, Canada.

Slinn, R.J., “International competitiveness in the pulp and paper industry.” InDOE Workshop on the Pulp and Paper Mill of the Future, 178-192,Reston, VA, Office of Industrial Technologies, 1993.

Smith, M., The US Paper Industry and Sustainable Production: An Argument for Restructuring. Cambridge, Mass; MIT Press, 1997.

Downloads

Published

— Updated on 2005-10-01

Versions

  • 2005-10-01 (2)
  • (1)

How to Cite

Olson, C. (2005). Can Joint Training Increase Union Knowledge and Power?. Just Labour, 6. https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.137

Issue

Section

Special Section