The Destruction of the "House": Changing Social Relations in a Restructured Factory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.14Abstract
This article explores the social changes within a dairy-products factory in Montevideo, Uruguay. Applying sociological research tools from ethnography and grounded theory, the data was collected through employment at the factory. My position as a temporary worker allowed me to interact with the many different individuals and social actors that made up the factory’s social universe. I observed major organizational shifts within the human resources department, such as the hiring of younger and more educated prospects for supervisory roles, as opposed to filling those positions with the older and more experienced workers. This shift towards “productive re-arrangement” was a consequence of the regional and commercial challenges which encouraged strategic changes to keep the company competitive. The most obvious and significant changes were found in the hiring process, when the factory began increasingly targeting temporary workers for employment. In this article, I argue that these changes were largely responsible for a new spirit and emotionality that began to emerge amongst the current working pool; one of uncertainty and mistrust. When the dairy factory altered its operating philosophy, so did its labourers. This study looks to capture the relations that developed between them.
References
Beaud, S. and M. Pialoux. 2001. “Between Mate and Scab. The contradictory inheritance of French workers in the postfordist factory.” Ethnography 2(3): 323-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14661380122230957
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Bourdieu, P. 1989. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory7(1):14-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Changes in the Labour Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Coriat, B. 1982. El taller y el Cronómetro: Ensayo sobre el Taylorismo, el Fordismo y la Producción en masa. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.
Lomando, L. 2013. “Conaprole se adelanta al futuro y va por más producción.” El Observador. Accessed May 29 2014: http://www.elobservador.com.uy/noticia/241500/conaprole-se-adelanta-al-futuro-y-va-por-mas-produccion/
Foucault, M. 2008 [1975]. Vigilar y Castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.
Frassa, J. 2008. “Tendencias globales y locales en los nuevos modelos de producción y organización del trabajo. Apuntes para la discusión.” Trabajo y Sociedad. Indagaciones sobre el trabajo, la cultura y las prácticas políticas en sociedades segmentadas 11(10): 1-14.
Geske, T. and B. Artinian. 2007. “A Personal Experience of Working with Classical Grounded Theory: From Beginner to Experienced Grounded Theorist.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 6(40): 67-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600405
Guber, R. 2011. La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.
Hall, W. and P. Callery. 2001. “Pearls, Pith, and Provocation: Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality.” Qualitative Health Research 11(2): 257-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119082
Neffa, J.C. 1999. “Crisis y emergencia de Nuevos Modelos Productivos” Pp. 39-70 in Los retos teóricos de los estudios del trabajo hacia el siglo XXI, edited by Enrique de La Garza Toledo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
Robertt, P. 2006. Reestruturação Produtiva e Social em uma Empresa Globalizada. O caso de Conaprole no Uruguai. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Federal Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Walker, D. and F. Myrick. 2006. “Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure.” Qualitative Health Research 16(4):547-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.