Recovering Marx’s Theory of Alienation: Theoretical Considerations from a Case Study with Community Activists in Scarborough, Ontario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.37Abstract
The expansive literature on alienation demonstrates how various treatments emphasize different parts of human estrangement. This recovery focuses on demonstrating how Marx’s theory of alienation can prove fruitful in understanding social movement activity and promoting social justice. At the centre of collective action is a hope and vision for an alternative future, an imagination of communities based on mutual reliance and a strategy for de-alienation. In this paper, I begin with a review of Marx’s theory with an emphasis on a philosophy of internal relations, followed by an application to a recently completed case study with housing activists in Scarborough, Ontario. By posing questions for further development, I conclude that social alienation and responses to it can be developed further when seen as a learning process; that is, to understand the learning processes of one’s own estrangement as central to taking positive steps to overcome alienation.
References
Berardi, F. 2009. The soul at work: From alienation to autonomy. Los Angeles, Calif.: Semiotext(e).
Brookfield, S. 2002. “Overcoming alienation as the practice of adult education: The contributions of Erich Fromm to a critical theory of adult learning and education.” Adult Education Quarterly 52(2):96-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713602052002002
Engeström, Y. 1999. “Activity theory and individual and social transformation.” Pp. 19-38 in Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
Miettinen, R. Punamäki-Gitai, and International Congress for Research on Activity Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Eyerman, R. and A. Jamison. 1991. Social movements: A cognitive approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Foley, G. 2001. “Radical Adult Education and Learning”, International Journal of Lifelong Learning 20(1/2):71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370010008264
Freire, P. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th anniversary edition). New York: Continuum.
Fromm, E. 1955. The Sane Society. New York: Rinehart.
Fromm, E. 1961. Marx's Concept of Man. New York: F. Ungar.
Fukuoka, M. 1978. The One-Straw Revolution: An Introduction to Natural Farming. Translated by C. Pearce, T. Kurosawa, and L. Korn. New York: Bantam.
Hall, B. L. and T. Turay. 2006. State of the field report: Social movement learning. Vancouver: Canadian Council on Learning.
Krinsky, J. 2008. “Changing Minds: Cognitive Systems and Strategic Change in Contention over Workfare in New York City.” Social Movement Studies 7(1): 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830801969274
Marx, K. 1961 [1844]. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Translated by
M. Milligan. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
M. Milligan. 1974 [1939]. Grundrisse. Translated by M. Nicolaus. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Oldenquist, A. 1991. “Community and de-alienation.” Pp. 91-108 in Alienation, Community, and Work, edited by A. Oldenquist and M. Rosner. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Ollman, B. 1976. Alienation: Marx's conception of man in capitalist society.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611902
Padgett, B. 2007. Marx and alienation in contemporary society. London: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Sawchuk, P. 2003. Adult Learning and Technology in Working-Class Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sawchuk, P. 2006. “Activity & Power: Everyday Life and Development of Working-Class Groups.” Pp. 241-67 in Critical Perspectives on Activity: Explorations Across Education, Work & Everyday Life, edited by P. Sawchuk, N. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509568
Duarte and M. Elhammoumi. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Duarte and M. Elhammoumi. 2010. “Socio-cognition and social movement theory: A Marxist activity theory perspective on community/union mobilization and change,” Paper presented at conference on Alternative Futures and Popular Protest, Manchester Metropolitan University, March 29–31.
Schacht, R. 1994. The future of alienation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schmitt, R. 2003. Alienation and freedom. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Seeman, M. 1959. “On the meaning of alienation.” American Sociological Review 24:783-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2088565
Sekelj, L. 1991. “State and Communism: Alienated and De-alienated Community.” Pp. 51-66 in Alienation, Community, and Work, edited by A. Oldenquist and M. Rosner. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Stetsenko, A. 2008. “From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3:471–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9111-3
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2011-01-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
