Effectiveness of Complaint-Driven Regulation of Child Labour in Alberta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.40Abstract
This study further develops our understanding of the employment experiences of children (ages 9-11) and adolescents (ages 12-14) in the Canadian province of Alberta, with particular attention to illegal employment and the effectiveness of complaint-based regulation. Survey data demonstrates there is a significant degree of illegal employment among children and adolescents. Interview data suggests that complaint-driven regulation of child labour is ineffective because parents, children and adolescents cannot identify violations and do not take action to trigger state enforcement.
References
AHRE. (2002). Domo fined for not paying employees. Press release. May 10.
AHRE. (2003). Domo charged for not paying employees again. Press release. November 4.
AHRE. (2004). Domo Gasoline Corporation Ltd. fined $23,000 for not paying
Barnetson, B. (2009a). The regulation of child and adolescent labour in Alberta.Just labour. 13. 29-47.
Barnetson, B. (2009b). Narratives justifying unregulated child agricultural employment in Alberta. Journal of rural and community development. 4(1). 67-83.
Bernstein, S., Lippel, K., Tucker, E. and Vosko, L. (2006). Precarious employment and the law’s flaws: Identifying regulatory failure and securing effective protection for workers. In L. Vosko (ed.). Precarious employment:Understanding labour market insecurity in Canada. Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press. 203-219.
Breslin, C., Koehoorn, M. and Cole, D. (2008). Employment patterns and work injury experience among Canadian 12 to 14 year olds. Canadian journal of public health. 99(3): 201-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405474
England, G. (2008). Employment law in Canada, 2nd Ed. Irwin: Aurora. Government of Alberta. (2010). Charges under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Employment Standards Code Downloaded 2010.01.19. http://employment.alberta.ca/SFW/6751.html
Hawkesworth, M. (1988). Theoretical issues in policy analysis. New York: State University of New York Press.
HRSDC. (2006). Minimum age for employment in Canada. Downloaded 2007.08.16 http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/lp/spila/clli/eslc/minage(e).pdf
Irvin, J., McBride, S. and Strubin, T. (2005). Child and youth employment standards: the experience of young workers under British Columbia’s new policy regime. Vancouver: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
Luke, H. & Moore, G. (2004). Who’s looking out for our kids. Deregulating child labour law in British Columbia. Vancouver: Canadian Centre for PolicyAlternatives.
McLean, A. (2010, March 18). Alberta temporary foreign workers getting ripped off: NDP. Edmonton journal. www.canada.com. Downloaded 2010.03.18.
O’Donnell, S. (2009, July 22). Capital Ex midway vendor faces $300,000 fine. Edmonton Journal. www.canada.com . Downloaded 2009.07.22. Barnetson 24
Schultz, L. and Taylor, A. (2006). Children at work in Alberta. Canadian public policy. 32(4): 431-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/A26M-7850-6574-8045
Teeple, G. (2006). The riddle of human rights. Garamond: Aurora.
Thomas, M. (2009). Regulating flexibility: The political economy of employment standards. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Tompa, E., Trevithick, S. and McLeod, C. (2007). Systematic review of the prevention incentives of insurance and regulatory mechanisms for occupational health and safety. Scandinavian journal of work, environment and health. 33(2): 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1111
Tucker, E. (1983/84). The determination of occupational health and safety standards in Ontario, 1860-1982. McGill Law Journal. 29: 260-311.
Tucker, E. (1988). Making the workplace ‘safe’ in capitalism. Labour/Le Travail. 21:45-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25142939
Tucker, E. (1990). Administering danger in the workplace: The law and politics of occupational health and safety regulation in Ontario, 1850-1914. Toronto:University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487574970
Weil, D. and Pyles, A. (2005). Why complain? Complaints, compliance and the problem of enforcement in the US workplace. Comparative labor law & policy journal. 27(1). 59-92.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2010-03-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.