Time as a Way Of Reconciling Conflict and Cooperation in the Employment Relationship: a View with Special Application to New Employment Forms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.41Abstract
Explanations of the coexistence of conflict and cooperation in the employment relationship are often vague and-or misleading. Authors have frequently failed to distinguish between institutional bases for cooperation and the ideological orientations of employers and employees. Previous theorizing has typically presented cross-sectional views where the employment relationship is presented outside of its temporal context. Here it is argued that the extent and nature of conflict and cooperation between employers and their workforce should be understood through appreciating that interest alignment changes as an employment relationship moves from a short to a long term. In practice, the institutional basis for conflict mostly exists in the short and long term and cooperation in the long term exclusively. Using survey data obtained from fast food workers, the theoretical and strategic consequences of this view are explored in relation to new employment forms which have a modified concept of a long term.
References
Ackers, P. and Payne, J. (1998). British Trade Unions and Social Partnership: Rhetoric, Reality and Strategy. International Journal of Human ResourceManagement, 9. Pp.529-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095851998341062
Alexander, R. and Lewer, J. (2004). Understanding Australian Industrial Relations. Thompson. Victoria.
Bain, G. and Clegg, H. (1974). A strategy for industrial relations research in Great Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 13 (1). Pp 91-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1974.tb00006.x
Belanger, J. and Edwards, P. (2007). The Conditions Promoting Compromise in the workforce. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45 (4). Pp.713-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00643.x
Burawoy, M. (1979), Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labour Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Cool, K. Henderson, J. E., and Abate, R. (2005). Restructuring Strategy: New Networks and Industry Challenges. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.
Cully, M. Woodland, S. Riley, A. and Dix, G. (1999). Britain at Work, as Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. Routledge. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203279915
Deaton, D. 1985. Management Style and Large Scale Survey Evidence. Industrial Relations Journal, 16(2): 67-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.1985.tb00516.x
Deery, S. Plowman, D. Walsh, J. and Brown, M. (2001). Industrial Relations: a contemporary analysis. McGaw-Hill: Sydney.
Department of trade and Industry (DTI). (1998). Fairness at Work. White Paper. London: HMSO.
Fox, A. (1974). Beyond Contract: Work Power and Trust Relations. Faber and Faber. London.
Gould, A. M. (2010). Working at McDonald’s: Some Redeeming Features of McJobs. Accepted for publication in Work Employment and Society. December, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010380644
Gould, A. M. (2009). Who is Suitable for Fast food Work: An Empirical Analysis of Ideal Fast Food Employees. Industrielles/ Industrial Relations. 64(3). Pp.376- 397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/038549ar
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA
Kalleberg, A. (2000). Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary,and Contract Work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26. Pp.341-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.341
Keenoy, T. & Kelly, D. (1999). The Employment Relationship in Australia 2nd ed. Sydney: Harcourt.
Kersley, B. Alpin, C. Forth, J. Bryson, A. Bewley, H. Dix, G. Oxenbridge, S. (2006). Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e589592011-001
Kochan, T. (1998). «What is distinctive about industrial relations research?». InKeith Whitfield and George Strauss, (Ed). Researching the World of Work –Strategies and Methods in Studying Industrial Relations. New York: Cornell University Press. Pp.31-45.
Leidner, R. (1993). Fast Food, Fast Talk. Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. University of California Press. Berkeley.
Marchington, M. & Parker, P. 1990. Changing Patterns of Employee Relations. London: Harvestor/Wheatsheaf.
McLoughlin, I. & Gourlay, S. 1992. Enterprise Without the Unions: The Management of Employee Relations in Non-Union Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(5): 669-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00684.x
Mishel, L, Bernstein, J. Shierholtz, H. (2009). The State of Working America: 2008/2009. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Purcell, J. & Sisson, K. 1983. Strategies and Practices in the Management of Industrial Relations. In G. Bain (Ed.), Industrial Relations in Britain: 95-120. Oxford: Blackwell.
Purcell, J. 1986. Employee Relations Autonomy within a Corporate Culture. Personnel Management, 39(1): 60-67.
Purcell, J. (1987). Mapping Management Styles in Employee Relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24 (5): 533-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00462.x
Royle, T, (2000). Working for McDonald’s in Europe: the Unequal Struggle. Routledge. London.
Sisson, K. 1989. Personnel Management in Perspective. In K. Sisson (Ed.), Personnel Management in Britain: 3-21. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, C. (2006). The double indeterminacy of labour power.: labour effort and labour mobility. Work Employment and Society, 20 (2) : Pp.389-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006065109
Storey, J. (1995). Human Resource Management: A Critical Text. Routledge. London.
Storey, J. and Bacon, N. (1993). Individualism and Collectivism: Into the 90s. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(3): 665-684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199300000042
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London and New York: Routledge.
Wright, E., O. (2004). Working-class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (4): pp957-1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/210397
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2010-03-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
