Varieties Of Social Unionism: Towards a Framework for Comparison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.84Abstract
In academic and activist debates about union renewal, the replacement of business unionism with social unionism is seen as central to the labour movement's short- and long-term survival. Social unionism, generally understood to involve both engagement with social justice struggles beyond the workplace and methods of union activity beyond the collective bargaining process, is claimed to increase the labour movement's organizing capacity, bargaining power, and social and political weight. However, despite its increased importance, social unionism's various meanings, strategies, and implications remain relatively unexamined, and very different approaches are often lumped together. Using concepts from social movement theory, this paper proposes an analytical framework for systematically comparing different concrete manifestations of social unionism. In particular, social unionist initiatives vary according to 1) the ethos or collective action frame used to rationalize union activity; 2) the repertoire or strategic means used to act on that ethos; and 3) the internal organizational practices and power relations which shape who is involved in defining and carrying out union goals and initiatives. I argue that whether social unionist projects are able to reach immediate instrumental goals as well as generate renewed working class / movement capacity is shaped by both the mix of frame, repertoire and organizational practice as well as the relationship between these three. The paper therefore asserts that the category "social unionism" must be more nuanced, and calls for a more explicitly comparative and multi-methodological approach to reveal such complexity.
References
Amalgamated Transit Union Canadian Council. 2003. Kyoto Policy Statement. Mississauga, ON: ATU, Retrieved July 8, 2006 (http://www.atucanada.ca/content_Resources_And_Publications/pdf/policies/KyotoPolicy.pdf).
Barker, C. and M. Lavelette. 2002. “Strategizing and the Sense of Context: Reflections on the First Two Weeks of the Liverpool Docks Lockout, September-October 1995”. In D.S. Meyer, N. Whittier, and B. Robnett (eds.) Social Movements: Identity, Culture, and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 140-156.
Benford, R. D. and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 26, pp. 611-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Bickerton, G. and C. Stearns. 2002. “The Struggle Continues in Winnipeg: The Workers’ Organizing and Resource Centre”. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society Vol. 1, pp. 50-57.
Briskin, L. 2004. “Still the Most Difficult Revolution? – A Report on a Conference on Women and Unions Held at Cornell University, (Nov 2003) in Honour of Alice H. Cook’s 100th Birthday.” Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society Vol. 4, pp. 96-101.
Bronfenbrenner, K. 2003. “The American Labour Movement and the Resurgence in Union Organizing”. In C. Yates and P. Fairbrother (eds.) Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study. London: Continuum, pp. 32-50.
Canadian Auto Workers (CAW). 2006. “Statement of Principles”. Constitution of the National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada, (CAW-Canada). Toronto: CAW-Canada, Retrieved October 23, 2006 (http://www.caw.ca/whoweare/CAWconstitution/cawconE.pdf).
Canadian Labour Congress (CLC). n.d. “About Us”. Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress, Retrieved July 8, 2006 (http://canadianlabour.ca/index.php/about_us).
Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). 2007. CUPE Celebrates: Year in Review 2006. Ottawa: CUPE.
Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). 2000. Who’s Pushing Privatization? Annual Report on Privatization. Ottawa: CUPE.
Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). 1999. On the Front Line: CUPE’s Action Plan. Ottawa: CUPE.
Canadian Union of Public Employees - Ontario Division. 2007. Agenda For Change: CUPE Ontario Action Plan. Toronto: CUPE Ontario.
Carroll, W.K. and R.S. Ratner. 2001. “Sustaining Oppositional Cultures in ‘Post-Socialist’ Times: A Comparative Study of Three Social Movement Organisations”. Sociology Vol.35, No. 3, pp. 605-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000311
Eisenscher, M. 1999. “Critical Juncture: Unionism at the Crossroads”. In B. Nissen (ed.) Which Direction for Organized Labor? Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 217-245.
Fletcher, B. and R. Hurd. 1998. “Beyond the Organizing Model: The Transformation Process in Local Unions”. In K. Bronfenbrenner et. al. (eds.) Organizing To Win: New Research on Union Strategies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 37-53 .
Fraser, N. 2005. “Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World”. New Left Review II/Vol. 36, pp. 69-88.
Frege, C., E. Heery, and L. Turner. 2004. “The New Solidarity? Trade Union Coalition-Building in Five Countries”. In C. Frege and J. Kelly (eds.) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270149.003.0008
Frege, C. and J. Kelly. 2003. “Union Revitalization Strategies in Comparative Perspective”. European Journal of Industrial Relations Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680103009001448
Gindin, S. 1995. The Canadian Auto Workers: The Birth and Transformation of a Union. Toronto: James Lorimer & Co.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.London: Harper & Row.
Gompers, S. 1948. “The Philosophy of Trade Unionism”. In E.W. Bakke and C. Kerr (eds.) Unions, Management and the Public. New York: Harcourt Brace, pp. 30-33.
Hall, P.A. and D. W. Soskice (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. London: Oxford University Press.
Hoxie, R. 1914. “Trade Unionism in the United States”. The Journal of Political Economy Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 201-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/252407
Hyman, R. 1971. Marxism and the Sociology of Trade Unionism. London: Pluto Press.
Johnson, P. 2001. “Organize for What? The Resurgence of Labor as a Citizenship Movement”. In L. Turner, H.C. Katz and R.W. Hurd (eds.) Rekindling the Movement: Labor’s Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 27-58.
Johnson, P. 1994. Success While Others Fail: Social Movement Unionism and the Public Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Kumar, P. and G. Murray. 2006. “Innovation in Canadian Unions: Patterns, Causes and Consequences”. In P. Kumar and C. Schenk (eds.) Paths to Union Renewal: Canadian Experiences. Toronto: Broadview / Garamond /CCPA, pp. 79-102 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442602236-007
Kumar, P. and G. Murray. 2002a. Innovation and Change in Labour Organizations in Canada: Results of the National 2000-2001 HRDC Survey. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada.
Kumar, P. and G. Murray. 2002b. “Canadian Union Strategies in the Context of Change”. Labor Studies Journal Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X0202600401
Lenin, V.I. 1902. What Is To Be Done? Burning Questions of our Movement. Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved October 29, 2007 (http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1901/witbd/index.htm).
Manchee, J. 2006, April/May. “Unions and the United Way: From Charity to Change”, Our Times, pp. 27-35.
Moody, K. 1997. Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy. New York: Verso.
Moody, K. 1988. An Injury to All: The Decline of American Unionism. New York: Verso.
Nissen, B. 2004. “The Effectiveness and Limits of Labor-Community Coalitions: Evidence from South Florida”. Labor Studies Journal Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 67-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lab.2004.0007
Nissen, B. 2003. “Alternative Strategic Directions for the U.S. Labor Movement: Recent Scholarship”. Labor Studies Journal Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 133-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lab.2003.0027
Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU). n.d. Why Choose OPSEU?. Toronto: OPSEU, Retrieved October 23, 2006 (http://www.opseu.org/Organizing/whychoose.htm).
Piven, F. F. and R. Cloward. 2000. “Power Repertoires and Globalization”. Politics and Society Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 413-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329200028003006
Robertson, D. and B. Murninghan. 2006. “Union Resistance and Union Renewal in the CAW”. In P. Kumar and C. Schenk (eds.) Paths to Union Renewal: Canadian Experiences. Toronto: Broadview / Garamond / CCPA, pp. 161-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442602236-012
Robinson, I. 1993. “Economistic Unionism in Crisis: The Origins, Consequences, and Prospects of Divergence in Labour-Movement Characteristics”. In J. Jenson and R. Mahon (eds.) The Challenge of Restructuring: North American Labor Movements Respond. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 19-47.
Ross, G. and J. Jenson. 1986. “Post-War Class Struggle and the Crisis of Left Politics”. In R. Miliband et.al. (eds.) Socialist Register 1985/86: Social Democracy and After. London: Merlin, pp. 23-49.
Ross, S. 2007, March 22. Community Jobs Coalition Meeting, Windsor, ON. Personal notes.
Ross, S. 2006, October 1. CAW Town Hall Meeting, Windsor, ON. Personal notes.
Schenk, C. 2003. “Social Movement Unionism: Beyond the Organizing Model”. In C. Yates and P. Fairbrother (eds.) Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study. London: Continuum, pp. 244-262.
Schenk, C. and E. Bernard. 1992. “Social Unionism: Labor as a Political Force”. Social Policy, Summer, pp. 38-46.
Snow, D.A. and R.D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization”. International Social Movement Research Vol. 1, pp. 197–217.
Steinberg, M.K. 1998. “Tilting the Frame: Considerations on Collective Action Framing from a Discursive Turn”. Theory and Society Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 845-872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006975321345
Stronach, F. and B. Hargrove. 2007, October 17. “For the sake of the auto
industry, we've put aside our differences: Magna and the CAW are trying an experimental approach to workplace happiness”. Globe and Mail, Retrieved October 17, 2007 (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071017.wcomagna17/BNStory/special).
Tarrow, S. 2002. “From Lumping to Splitting: Specifying Globalization and Resistance”. In J. Smith and H. Johnston (eds.) Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 229-249.
Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813245
Tattersall, A. 2006. “Bringing the Community In: Possibilities for Public Sector Union Success through Community Unionism”. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management Vol. 6, Nos. 2/3/4, pp. 186-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2006.010394
Tattersall, A. 2005. “There is Power in Coalition: A framework for assessing how and when union-community coalitions are effective and enhance union power”. Labour and Industry Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 97-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2005.10669325
Therborn, G. 1983. “Why Some Classes are More Successful Than Others”. New Left Review I/ Vol. 138, pp. 37-55.
Thompson, E.P. 1993. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century”. In Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture. New York: New Press, pp. 185-258.
Voss, K. and R. Sherman. 2003. “You Can’t Just Do It Automatically: The Transition to Social Movement Unionism in the United States”. In C. Yates and P. Fairbrother (eds.) Trade Unions in Renewal: A Comparative Study. London: Continuum, pp. 51-77.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2007-10-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
