CUPE’s Sympathy Strikes in British Columbia, October 2005: Raising the Bar for Solidarity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.85Abstract
From October 7-23, 2005, the strike by the 38,000-strong British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) was the “main event” in BC labour relations. Teachers demonstrated enormous solidarity and determination to achieve a fair negotiated settlement that they could put to a vote. The focus of this paper is not the BCTF strike itself but the remarkable sympathy strike action organized in support of BCTF, primarily by the BC division of CUPE. Such worker action is highly unusual. Since the 1940s sympathy strike action has been illegal and extremely rare. This paper sets CUPE-BC’s strikes in support of BCTF in the context of the legal framework established over half a century ago and the decline of sympathy strikes that followed. It then summarizes the events of October 2005 and examines the effects and significance of the strikes and what made them possible. It concludes with a reflection on the implications of these events for the labour movement. The analysis here is shaped by the perspective that public sector unions are best able to resist hostile governments when they adopt a militant and highly democratic approach that aims to build a broad social movement, sometimes referred to as social movement unionism.
References
BC Federation of Labour. 2005. Statement posted at (http://www.bcfed.com)on October 20 (paper copy in author’s possession).
BC Federation of Labour. n.d. [2005]. “BC Workers Support Teachers and Protest Bill 12.”
Camfield, David. 2006. "Neoliberalism and Working-Class Resistance in British Columbia: The Hospital Employees' Union Struggle, 2002-2004." Labour/Le Travail 57 (Spring), 9-41.
Camfield, David. 2007. “"Renewal in Canadian Public Sector Unions: Neoliberalism and Union Praxis." Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations 62.2, 282-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/016089ar
CBC 2005. “One More Hurdle in Teachers’ Strike.” Oct. 21. Accessed July 13, 2006. (http://www.cbc.ca/bc/story/bc_ready-bctf20051021.html)
CUPE-BC n.d. [2002?] “Defend ‘Strong Communities’ – CUPE’s Job Action Plan.”
Fudge, Judy and Eric Tucker. 2001. Labour Before the Law: The Regulation of Workers’ Collective Action in Canada, 1900-1948. Don Mills: Oxford UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442657274
Leier, Mark. 2003. “The Strike as Political Protest.” Unpublished research report. Accessed July 12, 2006. (http://www.sfu.ca/labour/HEU,%20The%20Strike%20as%20Political%20Protest5.pdf)
Matters, Bob. 2006. E-mails to author, July 9 and 10.
Moore, Oliver. 2005. “Teachers Get ‘A Way Out’.” Globe and Mail. October 14. S1, S3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1049
Reshef, Yonatan and Sandra Rastin. 2003. Unions in the Time of Revolution: Government Restructuring in Alberta and Ontario. Toronto: U of Toronto Press
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2007-10-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.