CUPE on Strike, 1963-2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.92Abstract
CUPE On Strike offers a profile of the 1502 CUPE strikes since the union's inception in 1963 until 2004. In addition to breakdowns by province and industry, it considers strike incidence over time, duration, size of strikes, contract status, results, and the pattern of lockouts and rotating strikes. Like the overall Canadian strike profile, a majority of strikes are in small workplaces and are settled relatively quickly. Not surprisingly, CUPE strikes are clustered in Public Administration, and Health Care and Social Assistance. This demographic might help to explain the fact that CUPE has been involved in fewer wildcats, lockouts and strikes for first contracts than other unions. Although the overall trend for Canada since the 1990s has been a decrease in strikes, a modest shift in the last five years is evident in the data. For CUPE, this means more workers on strike, longer strikes, and more lockouts, all of which suggest an escalation in employer aggression. The Canadian data which highlight increasing public sector militancy and the feminization of that militancy suggest that CUPE will be a key player in the map of labour militancy in the future.
This profile of the strike activities of CUPE, the largest union in Canada, makes visible the experience of strikes from the point of view of workers and their unions. Not only does it contribute to a labour militancy perspective on the quantitative data on work stoppages from Human Resources and Social Development Canada (HRSDC), it also demonstrates the potential of the data to enrich our understanding of worker militancies.
References
Akyeampong, Ernest. (2006) “Increased Work Stoppages.” Perspectives on Labour and Income 7, 8: 5-9.
Akyeampong, Ernest. (2006a) “Unionization.” Perspectives on Labour and Income 7, 8: 18-42.
Bordogna, Lorenza and Gian Primo Cella. (2002) “Decline or Transformation? Changes in Industrial Conflict and its Challenges.” Transfer 4: 585-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890200800401
Briskin, Linda. (2007a) “Public Sector Militancy, Feminization, and Employer Aggression: Trends in Strikes, Lockouts, and Wildcats in Canada from 1960 to 2004.” In Strikes in an International Perspective, Heiner Dribbusch, Dave Lyddon, Kurt Vandaele and Sjaak van der Velden, eds. Amsterdam: Aksant, forthcoming.
Briskin, Linda. (2007) “From Person-Days Lost to Labour Militancy: A New Look at the Canadian Work Stoppage Data.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations 62, 1: 31-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/015797ar
Briskin, Linda. (2006) “Feminization, Gendering and Worker Militancies.” Paper presented at session on “Theorizing Labour” at the meetings of the Society for Socialist Studies, Congress of the Humanities and Social Science, York University.
Briskin, Linda. (2005) “The Work Stoppage Data from Human Resources and Skills Development Canada: A Research Note.” Just Labour<http://www.justlabour.yorku.ca> 5: 80-89.
Campolietti, Michele, Robert Hebdon and Douglas Hyatt. (2005) “Strike Incidence and Strike Duration: Some New Evidence from Ontario.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 58, 4: 610-630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390505800405
Ewing, K.D., Sian Moore and Stephen Wood. (2003) Unfair Labour Practices: Trade Union Recognition and Employer Resistance. London: Institute of Employment Rights.
Godard, John. (1992) “Strikes as Collective Voice: A Behavioral Analysis of Strike Activity.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46, 1: 161-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399204600112
Gramm, Cynthia L. (1986) “The Determinants of Strike Incidence and Severity: A Micro-Level Study.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39, 3: 361-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398603900304
Gunderson, Morley, Bob Hebdon, Douglas Hyatt and Allen Ponak. (2005) “Strikes and Dispute Resolution.” In Union-Management Relations in Canada. 5th ed. Morley Gunderson, Allan Ponak and DaphneTaras, eds. Toronto: Pearson Addison Wesley, pp. 332-370.
Hallamore, Christopher. (2006) Industrial Relations Outlook 2006: Shifting Ground, Shifting Attitudes. Ottawa, Conference Board of Canada.
James, Brad and David Mackenzie. (2003) “Making the Right Choices.” Our Times22, 5: 8-10.
Labour Canada: Women's Bureau. (1975) Women in the Labour Force: Facts and Figures. [Cat No. L38-30/1975] Ottawa: Information Canada.
Ondrich, Jan and John Schnell. (1993) “Strike Duration and the Degree of Disagreement.” Industrial Relations 32, 3: 412-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1993.tb01057.x
Panitch, Leo and Donald Swartz. (2003) From Consent to Coercion: The Assault on Trade Union Freedoms. Aurora, Ontario: Garamond Press.
Peirce, Jon and Karen Bentham. (2007) Canadian Industrial Relations. 3rd ed. Toronto: Prentice Hall. Renaud, Louise and Marc Lacroix; revised by Bruce Aldridge, Patrick Dubuc, Michel Hébert, and Lina Trépanier. (2005) Training Manual: Work Stoppages. Work Stoppage, Labour Organization, and Collective Agreement Analysis Section of the Workplace Information Directorate.
Statistics Canada. (2006) Women in Canada: A Gender-based Statistical Report, 5th edn, Minister of Industry, Ottawa.
Statistics Canada. (2006a) Improvements in 2006 to the Labour Force Survey (LFS). Available at: http://www.statcan.ca/bsolc/english/bsolc?catno=71F0031XIE
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2007-03-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
