Comments on “An Empirical Assessment of the Employee Free Choice Act: the Economic Implications” by Ann Layne-Farrar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.48Abstract
“An Empirical Assessment of the Employee Free Choice Act: The Economic Implications” by Ann Layne-Farrar provides empirical evidence concerning the impact on the U.S. unemployment rate and employment-to-population ratio should the highly controversial Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) become law. The paper has received widespread public attention and its analysis is being used in the debate surrounding the EFCA. This commentary raises three important questions about the empirical analysis: Are the predictions presented in the study, concerning the effects of the EFCA, realistic? Is the research design likely to identify the effects of the EFCA? Why do the data used in the analysis cover such a short time period? The discussion suggests the empirical results presented in Layne-Farrar (2009) should be viewed with considerable skepticism.
References
Carter, A. and E. Lotke. 2007. “The Employee Free Choice Act Impact on Health Care and Pension Benefits”. Institute for America’s Future, April. http://www.ourfuture.org/files/z_historic/EFCA/UnitedStatesofAmercia.pdf.
Johnson, S. 2002. “Card Check or Mandatory Vote? How the Type of Union Recognition Procedure Affects Union Certification Success”. Economic Journal. Vol. 112, No. 479 (April), pp. 344-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00039
Johnson, S. 2004. “The Impact of Mandatory Votes on the Canada-U.S. Density Gap: A Note”. Industrial Relations. Vol. 43, No. 2 (April), pp. 356-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00333.x
Layne-Farrar, A. 2009. “An Empirical Assessment of the Employee Free Choice Act: The Economic Implications”. Working Paper posted on the Social Sciences Research Network in March. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1353305
Levine, A. 2009. “Shilling on the Corporate Dollar.” In these Times, May 31. http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/4461/shilling_on_the_corporate_dollar/
Maher, K. 2009. “Economists Debate Pro-Labor Measure.” Wall Street Journal, March 2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123595413617305463.html
Martinello, F. 2000. “Mr. Harris, Mr. Rae and Union Activity in Ontario”. Canadian Public Policy. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 17-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3552254
Riddell, C. 2004. “Union Certification Success under voting versus card-check procedures: Evidence from British Columbia, 1978-1998”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 493-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390405700402
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Hearing on Rebuilding Economic Security: Empowering Workers to Restore the Middle Class, March 10, 2009, http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_03_10/Layne-Farrar.pdf.
Slinn, S. 2004. “An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the Change from CardCheck to Mandatory Vote Certifications”. Canadian Labor and Employment Law Journal. Vol. 11, pp. 259-302.
Statistics Canada. Perspectives on Labour and Income. Catalogue no. 75-001-XPE. Union membership data are presented annually in the Autumn issue.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.
