Give Me the Room to Learn: Associations Between Job Control and Work-Related Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.83Abstract
Societal rhetoric claims that the intellectual capital of workplaces must be leveraged if Canada is to compete in the "knowledge economy". To achieve this, however, employers must create work environments that are favorable to workers and conducive to learning. This paper uses a sample of 5800 Canadian workers from the Work and Lifelong Learning Survey and twenty interviews with Information Technology workers from the Education-Job Requirement Matching Project to focus on the relationship between worker control and learning engagement. The data show that increased levels of social and technical control are associated with increased worker engagement in formal courses, informal education (mentoring) and non-taught learning. This research has implications for job design that includes real and meaningful opportunities for worker input and agency into their own tasks and broader organizational decision-making. These results provide important information for future research regarding the inclusion and conceptualization of learning and job control constructs.
References
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: New York Monthly Review Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1
Burns, G. 1999. “Dichotomization of formal and informal education: The marginalization of elders and problems of aboriginal education and native studies in the public educational system.” In P. J. Gamlin, M. G. Luther, and G. Wagner, Eds., Exploring Human Potential: New Directions in Facilitating Growth in the New Millennium. Toronto: Captus University Press.
Colley, H., P. Hodkinson, and J. Malcolm. 2003. Informality and Formality in Learning. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Dastmalchian A, and P. Blyton. 2001. “Workplace Flexibility and the Changing Nature of Work: An Introduction.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18(1): 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2001.tb00238.x
Gagnon, L. and P. Doray. 2005. Corporate Training and the Knowledge Society: A Re-examination of Factors Influencing Participation. Working Paper, UQAM.
Hirst, P., and J. Zeitlin. 1991. “Flexible Specialization versus Post-Fordism: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications.” Economy and Society 20(1): 1-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149100000001
Holman, D. J. and T. D. Wall. 2002. “Work Characteristics, Learning-Related Outcomes, and Strain: A Test of Competing Direct Effects, Mediated, and Moderated Models.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7(4): 283-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.7.4.283
Hoque, K. and I. Kirkpatrick. 2003. Non-Standard Employment in the Management and Professional Workforce: Training, Consultation and Gender Implications. Work, Employment and Society 17(4):667-689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003174004
Hughes, J. 2005. Bringing Emotion to Work: Emotional Intelligence, Employee Resistance and the Reinvention of Character. Work, Employment and Society 19(3): 603-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005055675
Kusterer, K. C. 1978. Know-How on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of ‘Unskilled’ Workers. Boulder: Westview Press. Leont’ev, A. N. 1978. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Livingstone, D. W. 1999. “Exploring the Icebergs of Adult Learning: Findings of the First Canadian Survey of Informal Learning Practices.” Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education 13(2): 49-72.
Livingstone, D. W. 2001. “Worker Control as the Missing Link: Relations Between Paid/Unpaid Work and Work-Related Learning.” Journal of Workplace Learning 13(7/8): 308-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006121
Livingstone, D. W. 2005. “Exploring Adult Learning and Work in Advanced Capitalist Society.” PASCAL International Observatory. http://www.obs-pascal.com/ resources/davidlivingstoneoctober2005.pdf.
Livingstone, D. W. and A. Scholtz. 2006. “Contradictions of Labour Processes and Workers’ Use of Skills in Advanced Capitalist Economies.” In Work and Labour in Tumultuous Times: Critical Perspectives, W. Clement and V. Shalla, Eds., Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
McNamee, S. J. and R. D. Vanneman. 1983. “The Perception of Class: Social and Technical Relations of Production.” Work and Occupations 10(4): 437-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888483010004004
Rifkin, J. 1995. The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2007-10-01 (2)
- (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All reproduction, electronic or otherwise, of the material from Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, is allowable free of charge for education purposes.
The content of the reproduced material must not be altered in any way. Institutions and organizations must notify the Centre for Research on Work and Society (CRWS) of their intention to reproduce, distribute and/or require monetary compensation for Just Labour material.
Any monetary compensation derived from the sale of Just Labour material must not exceed the minimum recovery cost of reproduction.
The Centre for Research on Work and Society reserves the right to review this policy at any time with no retroactive consequences for institutions and individuals who have received permission to reproduce material.